|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
|
Case ID: 2672 | Insurance | 03/08/2004
The court has given its final approval to a $5 million settlement in a class action filed against insurer Aetna, Inc. and its subsidiaries on behalf of dentists who alleged that the Hartford-based insurer interfered with dental procedures in order to cut costs, and forced dentists to comply with excessive paperwork, in violation of antitrust laws and the federal Racketeering and Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act. Dentists who wish to take part in the settlement will have to fill out a claim form that is to be made available through the mail and on the settlement site that has been established by Aetna.
All dentists who have provided services to Aetna members since August 15, 1995, are eligible to take part in the settlement. Aetna will pay $4 million to between 40,000 and 50,000 U.S. dentists and $1 million to the ADA Foundation, their charitable group. The agreement, which must be approved by the U.S. District Court in Miami, is similar to a May 22, 2003, settlement of a lawsuit filed by hundreds of thousands of doctors who sued over payment and treatment issues. The settlement also calls for establishing a committee to advise Aetna on issues important to dentists, the timely processing of claims, initiatives to reduce claims resubmissions and disclosure of claims-editing policies, procedures and practices. Aetna, anticipating the cost of the settlement, took a $115.4 million charge in the second quarter that included the cost of its agreement with physicians. A key beneficiary of the settlement will be the Association's charitable arm, the ADA Foundation--and through it, the entire dental profession and the patients it serves. But ADA and ADAF officials are encouraging class members to donate their share of the settlement to the Foundation, which will use it for dental health education, research, access-to-care and other charitable programs. Dentists who choose to donate their portion of the settlement to the ADA Foundation have two options. The first and simplest option is to do nothing--that is, don't file a Proof of Claim form, in which case the settlement share the dentist may be entitled to would be donated automatically to the Foundation. The second option, which may yield a tax deduction for the donor, is to fill out the Proof of Claim form and indicate, by checking a box on the form, that payment is to be made directly to ADAF. The settlement will not be effective until the court grants it final approval. The court has not yet scheduled a hearing on the matter. At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Insurance Cases of Interest Oregon’s State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation May Have Hid Money That Belonged to Policyholders A class action has been filed against Oregon’s State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation (SAIF) on behalf of Oregon businesses that paid the company workers’ compensation premiums, which allege that the agency has repeatedly broken state workers’ comp law in its attempts to dominate Oregon's workers’ compensation insurance market. The action also alleges that SAIF is holding as much as $700 million that it should have rebated to policyholders. Numerous class actions have been filed against New Hampshire banks and credit insurance companies on behalf of persons who financed vehicles in New Hampshire, purchased credit life or credit disability insurance, and then paid off their loans early between 1999 and the present. The actions allege that the defendants failed to return the unused premiums in violation of New Hampshire insurance law. Many single parents who work for a living struggle to make ends meet, due to circumstances completely beyond their control. A class action has been filed against Ron Ross, director of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, on behalf of Nebraskans who are single parents and who were removed from Medicaid in 2002 during a special budget-cutting session of the Nebraska legislature, alleging that they were denied the Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA) allowed by federal law. A recent appeals court ruling has reinstated the parents' Medicaid payments until the resolution of the TMA issue. A Florida appeals court has ruled that a massive rate hike for windstorm insurance on coastal homes was approved improperly four years ago. The underlying class action against the Florida Windstorm Underwriting Association has been remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. The decision opens the way for refunds or credits to the 400,000 homeowners covered by the state's windstorm insurance pool when the rate hike was imposed. Persons affected by the insurance hike should contact attorneys for the class for more information. The settlement was announced by attorneys representing TMA and more than 900,000 physicians and their medical societies nationwide. This national class action suit was pending in the federal court of the Southern District of Florida. Holders of certain annuities may be entitled to compensation based upon information and belief that New York Life Insurance and Annuities Company may not have paid the holders of the annuities all amounts due them as agreed under the annuity contracts. |
|
Class Action Lawsuit Center ||
Product Recall Center ||
Consumer Complaint Center ||
About LawCash
Link Exchange
Privacy Policy ||
Legal Policies ||
Terms & Conditions ||
Website Advertising Policy ||
Site Map ||
Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.









