Coast National's Automobile Insurance Policyholders in California Recover $6,305,000 |
 |
 |
|
|
The parties have reached a proposed $6,305,000 settlement in a class action against Coast National Insurance Company by former California automobile insurance policyholders who claim that Coast National wrongly canceled their policies for nonpayment of premiums. The action is on behalf of all persons in California who purchased an automobile insurance policy from Coast National on or after December 18, 1996, whose policies were later canceled for nonpayment of premiums when in fact the insureds were not in default in the payment of premiums. To recover under the settlement, class members must submit a claim form postmarked by September 15, 2003.
To get a claim form, either visit the settlement website or call (877) 347-6461.
If you remain a member of the settlement class--whether or not you file a claim form--you will release all of your claims that could be asserted in a separate class action in the Alameda County Superior Court, Mackey v. Bristol West Insurance Services, in which claims are also asserted against Coast National. You will be a settlement class member unless you mail a exclusion form postmarked no later than September 15.
The settlement will not be final until the court grants it final approval. The court has scheduled a hearing on the matter for October 27, 2003.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Government Cases of Interest
A class action has been filed against body armor manufacturer Armor Holdings, Inc., on behalf of all persons, agencies, or entities that purchased, owned, have been issued, or possess vests containing Zylon, manufactured by Armor Holdings between April 7, 1999, and April 7, 2004. The action alleges that Zylon, the protective fiber used in the vests, deteriorates when exposed to heat and other conditions over time so that the vests lose their protective qualities. A potential federal class-action lawsuit alleges that there is a long-standing practice of excessive force at Sacramento's Main Jail. Robert Hunter, a 52-year-old veterinarian filed the lawsuit. He was arrested on suspicion of drunken driving early Sept. 17 and spent the night in the Main Jail. While there, his suit claims, three deputies threw him to the floor and fractured his elbow when he tried to signal them that the holding cell's toilet was clogged and overflowing.
United States Army Officials recently issued a release stating that soldiers will no longer be allowed to wear body armor other than the protective gear issued by the military. Army officials reported that the order was prompted by concerns that soldiers or their families were buying inadequate or untested commercial armor from private companies, including the popular Dragon Skin gear made by California-based Pinnacle Armor. A class action has been filed against the United States Postal Service on behalf of employees who allege that the Service systematically and purposefully altered their electronic timeslips to avoid paying them overtime, in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Privacy Act of 1974. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. Qualified employees should join the action as soon as possible to prevent forfeiture of benefits because of the operation of federal statutory deadlines. The ACLU, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Greenpeace and several individuals, filed one of the two lawsuits filed against the National Security Agency over its once-secret wiretapping program. A class action has been filed against the State of Kansas alleging unlawful discrimination in domestic relations matters concerning child custody and child support from non-custodial parents. The complaint alleges that these parents do not enjoy the same degree of physical, possessory and legal rights regarding aspects of the care, custody and management of their children as do custodial parents. Class members seek immediate restoration of equal custodial rights along with other remedies.
|