|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 2645 | Technology | 09/19/2003
On September 11, 2003, the jury ruled against the plaintiffs in a class action filed against computer giant Hewlett-Packard Company on behalf of North Carolinians who purchased certain HP DeskJet, OfficeJet, or Photosmart printers between August 1, 1998, and November 30, 2000. The action alleged that HP did not disclose to consumers that the ink cartridges that accompanied the printers were only filled to half of their total capacity in violation of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices statute. Unless the plaintiffs appeal, this ends the case.
The class is composed of current North Carolina residents who (1) purchased one of the following HP printers at a store in North Carolina between August 1, 1998, and November 30, 2000: DeskJet Printer models 350C, 648C, 695C, 697C, 710C, 712C, 720C, 722C, 830C, 832C, 880C, 882C, 895Cse, 895Cxi, 930C, 932C, 950C, 952C, 970Cse, or 970Cxi. OfficeJet Printer models 600, 630, 700, 710, 720, T45, T45xi, T65, T65xi, PSC 500, PSC 500xi. Photosmart Printer models P1000 or P1100. and (2) received an HP print cartridge or cartridges that was labeled with the word "Economy" and had a model number ending with the letter "G." If you have questions about the action, please contact the class administrator at info@nchpclassadministrator.com. At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Technology Cases of Interest Promotional campaigns that make promises create binding contracts that the promoting company is then responsible to fulfill. The parties have reached a nationwide $525,000 settlement in a class action against America Online, Inc. and Talk America, Inc. on behalf of all persons signed up for long-distance telephone service with Talk America pursuant to a "free AOL" offer, at any time between December 3, 1997, and October 1, 2001. The parties have reached a $37 million settlement in an SEC administrative proceeding filed against Symbol Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:SBL) on behalf of stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 15, 2000, to October 17, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the prosecuting attorneys for more information.
Several class actions have been filed against the officers and directors of biotechnology company Organogenesis, Inc. (formerly AMEX: ORG) by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between November 15, 1999, and January 30, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a lawsuit against Sony BMG, demanding that the company repair the damage done by the First4Internet XCP and SunnComm MediaMax software it included on over 24 million music CDs. A class action has been filed in the Northern District Court of California against Tripath Technology, Inc., a California based technology company, (NASDAQ: TRPH) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between January 29, 2004 and October 22, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. Debt securities are sold to investors with the promise that they will be paid with or without interest at the end of a specified period. The parties have reached a tentative $3.75 million settlement of several class actions filed against technology company Lucent Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LU) and certain of its officers and directors by security holders who purchased the following debt securities: (1) 6.9% notes due July 15, 2001; (2) 7.25% notes due July 15, 2006; (3) 6.5% debenture due January 15, 2028; (4) 5.5% notes due November 15, 2008; and (5) 6.45% Debentures due March 15, 2029, during the period from December 20, 2000 through March 27, 2001. To recover under the settlement, a completed proof of claim postmarked no later than March 31, 2004, must be mailed to the claims administrator. |
IT'S FREE
|
Class Action Lawsuit Center ||
Product Recall Center ||
Consumer Complaint Center ||
About LawCash
Link Exchange
Privacy Policy ||
Legal Policies ||
Terms & Conditions ||
Website Advertising Policy ||
Site Map ||
Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
