Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Flowserve Charged with Multiple Misrepresentations

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2624 | Stocks | 12/29/2004

A class action has been filed against flow control equipment manufacturer Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 23, 2001, and September 27, 2002. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

During this time period, the defendants allegedly issued statements that failed to disclose, or misrepresented, the following adverse facts, among others:

1. That Flowserve's declining revenues and earnings during 2001 and 2002 would have caused the company to violate its loan covenants but for its public stock offerings, which enabled the company to reduce its debt, obtain favorable interest rates and debt refinancings from lenders, and enable Flowserve to fund the acquisition of the Flow Control Division of Invensys plc (IFC), among other things.

2. That demand for the company's products had materially declined, especially its aftermarket sales or "quick-turnaround business," resulting in revenue and earnings shortfalls.

3. That the company's recent acquisitions, including Ingersoll-Dresser Pump Company (IDP) and IFC, had not materially altered the company's dependence on revenue streams from the chemical industry, or further stabilized its aftermarket revenue streams for its pump and valve business through significant cross-selling opportunities, among other things.

4. That the company's reorganizations, downsizing and facility closures, following its acquisition of Innovative Valve Technologies, Inc., IDP and IFC, had failed to eliminate excess manufacturing capacity resulting in the material erosion of the company's gross margins and earnings.

5. That the company had severe and continuing integration problems following the acquisition of Innovative Valve Technologies, resulting in a disruption of the company's service and maintenance operations and contributing to the decline in Flowserve's high-margin service revenues, eventually necessitating the reorganization of the company's service business segment.

6. That, based on the foregoing, the defendants' opinions, projections and forecasts concerning the company and its operations were lacking in a reasonable basis at all times.

On September 27, 2002, Flowserve warned of a 21% earnings shortfall for the quarter ending September 30, 2002, and cut its full year 2002 earnings guidance by over 60%, to $1.45 per share, from the $2.30 per share earnings guidance shared with investors during roadshow presentations promoting the company's public offerings less than six months prior.

Market reaction to the company's announcement was swift and severe. Flowserve shares fell over 38% to close at $8.70 on September 27, 2002, a decline of more than 75% from the time-period high of $34.90 reached on May 2, 2002.

Prior to the disclosure of the true facts, Flowserve completed two public offerings of its common stock, thereby raising $434 million, and Flowserve insiders sold their personally-held Flowserve common stock, generating millions in proceeds.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against Immucor, Inc. (BLUD), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 7, 2005 and August 29, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. (NYSE:HRH), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 14, 2002 and May 26, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against Central Freight Lines, Inc. (Nasdaq: CENF) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock pursuant to its December 12, 2003, initial public offering. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
According to the Complaint, Plaintiff brings this class action on behalf of all persons similarly situated, (the "Class"), other than Defendants and their affiliates, who (1) purchased or otherwise acquired the common shares of EnerNOC, Inc. ("EnerNOC" or the "Company) between November 1, 2007, through and including, February 27, 2008, (the "Class Period"); and/or (2) purchased or otherwise acquired EnerNOC common stock pursuant to Prospectus on Form 424B4 filed November 13, 2007 ("November 13 Prospectus") between November 13, 2007 through and including February 27, 2008, for violations of the federal securities laws. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused to the Class by Defendants' violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").
 
A class action has been filed against KLA-Tencor Corporation (KLAC), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 13, 2003 and May 22, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (BOL), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 27, 2005 and December 22, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.