IL Recipients of Allied Interstate "One-Time" Debt Resolution Offers Certified as Class |
 |
 |
|
|
The class has been certified in a class action against debt collection agency Allied Interstate, Inc. on behalf of all persons with Illinois addresses who, on or after February 10, 2002, have been sent a collections letter regarding an unpaid residential telephone service debt that offered to settle the debt at a 50% or greater discount by the agency, but contained a purported deadline for payment. The action alleges that the company violated the federal Fair Debt Collections Act by making bogus "one-time" settlement offers to debtors. The action seeks compensatory and punitive damages, and an order prohibiting Allied from sending the allegedly deceptive letters to Illinois addressees.
The action alleges that Allied, which is part of IntelliRisk Management Corporation, misled named plaintiff Elle Seidat to believe that her debt would be settled upon paying 70 percent of what she owed when, in fact, she still would owe the other 30 percent to AT&T. Ms. Seidat alleges that Allied sent three letters to her between June and September 2002, each of which offered to "settle" her account for 70 percent of the outstanding balance.
In addition to allegedly misleading Ms. Seidat about the effect of a 70 percent payment, the action also alleges that the letters contained fictitious deadlines intended to mislead her into believing that she would lose the opportunity to settle the debt for a 70 percent payment if the stated deadline passed.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest
New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer filed a $250 million fraud suit against H&R Block Inc., accusing the nation's largest tax preparation service of fraudulently pushing clients to invest their tax refunds in retirement accounts that had high fees and low returns. The lawsuit is on behalf of customers who have opened the Express IRA accounts. In addition to the multiple companies suing Visa and Mastercard over excessive processing fees, two more retail groups announced that they have filed class action suits against Visa USA, MasterCard Inc. and a number of major banks over the fees they charge for processing credit card transactions.
The latest cases, filed in the U.S. Court for the Eastern District of New York, were brought by the American Booksellers Association and the National Grocers Association and several of its members, including Affiliated Foods Midwest, Coborn's Inc., D'Agostino's Supermarkets and the Minnesota Grocers Association.
If a telemarketer asks you for money up front, you should question the wisdom of paying. The Federal Trade Commission has reached a $3.9 million settlement with the Electronic Financial Group, Inc. on behalf of consumers who were taken advantage of by the defendants in advance-fee debit card marketing scams. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the FTC for more information. The parties have reached a tentative $120,000 settlement in an action filed against NCO Financial Systems, Inc. on behalf of all persons who took out a personal loan which was previously owned or serviced by Commercial Financial Services (CFS), and which was reported by NCO to one or more credit reporting agencies between October 10, 1999, and March 31, 2004. The action alleged that NCO violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by reporting false information to credit reporting agencies. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact attorneys for the class. A class action lawsuit has been filed against a title company in the Circuit Court of Cook County (Chicago) Illinois.
A statewide class action has been filed in New York against collections specialist, Collection Information Bureau. The action is brought on behalf of all New York consumers who received "form type" collection letters from Collection Information at any time since March 11, 2003. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
|