Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

U.S. Travel Agents Certified as Class in Antitrust Action Against 15 Major Airlines

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2547 | Employment | 01/08/2004

A class action has been certified against 15 major U.S. and foreign airlines on behalf of all travel agents in the United States, Puerto Rico, and the United States Virgin Islands who issued tickets, miscellaneous charge orders, or prepaid ticket advances between October 1, 1997, and the eventual date of any judgment in the action. The action alleges that the airlines for whom the travel agents issued the tickets unlawfully conspired to reduce or eliminate the commissions they pay to travel agents for sales of domestic and international travel tickets, in violation of federal antitrust laws. The action seeks compensatory and punitive damages, and an order prohibiting the airlines from engaging in further anticompetitive activity.

The action alleges that the named airlines conspired in four base commission cuts since 1997, and structured their announcements to occur at different times, to make it look as though each airline made its cuts independently rather than in concert with the others. The action also alleges that if any of the airlines had cut commissions individually without similar cuts by all other airlines, it would have been harmful to those that introduced the cuts, not economically helpful. Only by the coordinated commission cutting by all airlines could they avoid being subjected to losses of fares from agents.

As an example of what would have happened in the absence of a conspiracy, the action points to United Airlines' attempts to cut commissions in 1981: It lowered its commission rates by imposing a system of flat-fee commissions. The system was in place about five days, but when other carriers failed to follow suit, United withdrew its reduced commission program and reverted to the pre-existing system so as not to lose business to other airlines because of travel agents' shifting business to those airlines paying higher commission rates.

The four commission cuts or caps listed in the action include a reduction from ten percent to eight percent in September 1997; an imposed commission cap of $50 for one-way international air travel and $100 for round-trip international air travel beginning in October 1998; a reduction from eight percent to five percent beginning in October 1999; and a cap reduction for domestic tickets starting in August 2002.

Additionally, the action alleges that certain airlines jointly formed the Orbitz website to sell airline tickets in the United States with the goal of eventually eliminating the need for travel agents. United, Delta, Northwest, Continental and American Airlines allegedly formed a joint venture as an opportunity to collectively further reduce travel agent commissions even further by excluding them from the sale of airline tickets altogether.

The airlines named in the action are United Airlines, Inc.; American Airlines; Delta Airlines; Northwest Airlines, Inc.; Continental Airlines, Inc.; US Airways, Inc.; Midwest Express Airlines, Inc.; Airtran Holdings, Inc.; America West Airlines, Inc.; Frontier Airlines, Inc.; Alaska Air Group, Inc.; Alaska Airlines, Inc.; Societe Air France; KLM Royal Dutch Airlines; Deutsche Lufthansa, AG; and Air Canada.

From 1995 to 2000, the number of travel agencies in the United States declined by roughly 25 percent.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida against Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. The case involves violations of employment law pertaining to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in United States District Court against Knoll Services, Inc. The case involves violations of federal labor law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Western District Court of Missouri against Arkansas based furniture company, Hank's Furniture, in the Western District Court of Missouri for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The class seeks unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, interest, attorney's fees and costs.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida against Louis v. J & L Construction, Inc. The case involves violations of employment law pertaining to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of hourly workers employed at Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc. The suit alleges that the company routinely denied overtime pay to employees who had worked hours in excess of 40 per week. The workers are seeking back overtime pay and other damages.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against Suncoast Moving & Storage Corporation and Paychex Business Solutions, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all hourly "non-exempt" employees who have not been paid overtime compensation for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, all potential class members must "opt-in" in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.