California Class Certified in Action Claiming that Leatherman Tools Aren't Made in the USA |
 |
 |
|
|
A class action has been certified against the Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. on behalf of all persons who, between April 2, 1997, and the date of any eventual judgment in this action, purchased for personal, family, or household purposes any Leatherman tool in California that was contained in packages on which an unqualified "Made in U.S.A." or "U.S.A." representation was made. The action alleges that the company violated California's Unfair Competition Law and Consumer Legal Remedies Act by falsely advertising that its products were completely made in America. The action seeks compensatory damages, and an order from the court that will force Leatherman to state truthfully where its tools are manufactured.
The action alleges that the company sold its tools in packaging indicating that they were produced completely in the United States, when in actuality certain parts were manufactured outside the country. California's consumer protection laws--which are more stringent in some ways than those of other states--prohibit the unqualified use of statements like "Made in the U.S.A." if a product is made of parts manufactured in another country, even if the final product was in fact assembled here.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest
Buyers at the failed 1390 Brickell Bay condominium tower have filed a class-action lawsuit against developer Kenneth Baboun and his company BBB Group claiming fraud and breach of contract. Baboun pulled the plug on the proposed 49-story condo near Miami's Brickell Avenue in February, saying hurricane-related delays and rising construction costs doomed the project. He returned buyers' deposits, which amounted to 20 percent of their purchase price earlier this year. Homeowners in Ontario and Wisconsin have filed separate class-action suits against Carrier Corp., seeking compensation for corrosion in furnaces sold since the mid-1980s under the Carrier, Bryant, Day & Night, or Payne brand names. Lawyers plan to seek financial compensation for more than 14 million Americans who paid too much for heating and cooking fuel because British Petroleum (BP) oil compay allegedly manipulated the market for propane. Several class actions have been filed against retail clothing giant Tommy Hilfiger Corporation (NYSE: TOM) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between November 3, 1999 and September 24, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
Scientific studies have shown that light cigarettes are every bit as hazardous to your health as regular ones. A class action has been filed against cigarette maker Philip Morris USA, Inc. on behalf of all persons who purchased Philip Morris "Light," "Ultra-Light," or "Low-Tar" cigarettes in Georgia for personal consumption but who do not have any claims for personal injuries resulting from the purchase or consumption of cigarettes. The action alleges that the company deceived smokers into believing that light cigarettes were safer than other brands in violation of state consumer protection laws. Samsung Electronics Co. and Hynix Semiconductor Inc. are making large compensation payments to U.S. consumers who filed class-action lawsuits over the two companies' fixing of computer memory chip prices. In 2005, the chipmakers were ordered by the U.S. Justice Department to pay $300 million and $182 million in fines, respectively, for their roles in price-fixing activities. On top of the fines, the two companies are paying compensation money to U.S. consumers who filed damage lawsuits.
|