Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

First Union Settles With Mortgage Borrowers for Failing to Fully Disclose Loan Costs

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2544 | Credit / Debt | 05/17/2004

The parties have reached a tentative partial settlement in a national class action against lenders First Union National Bank of Delaware, First Union Home Equity Bank, and First Union Home Equity Corporation (collectively known as "First Union") on behalf of all persons who obtained a home equity or other loan that resulted in a mortgage from the lenders that was brokered or referred to First Union by either Pennsylvania Resource Corporation or First Liberty Financial Services at any time between May 10, 1995, and the eventual date of any judgment in the action. The action alleges that the lenders did not provide consumers with complete information about the closing costs that they paid and the terms of their loans in order to obtain home equity loans or similar loans secured by a mortgage from First Union in violation of state and federal lending laws. Claim forms must be received by August 11, 2003, to be considered valid.

More specifically, the action alleges that, at the time affected homeowners signed contracts with Pennsylvania Resource Corporation to do home improvement work, the homeowners all received the very same "good faith estimates of closing costs" or GFEs. Allegedly, these preprinted forms significantly understated the homeowners' actual closing costs. The homeowners also were allegedly given a document called a "Savings Proposal" that set forth the approximate amount of their new monthly payments. These estimated monthly payments were allegedly based on closing costs that were not revealed in the GFEs that the homeowners initially received. At the time of their loan closings, the homeowners learned that their actual monthly payments would be about equal to their estimated monthly payments. Because of this alleged ruse, homeowners had no reason to suspect that their actual closing costs were significantly higher than those set forth in the GFEs which they originally received.

Under the terms of the proposed settlement, First Union will offer to re-finance home equity loans of qualifying borrowers, which closed on or after May 10, 1995, at lower interest rates, without charging any closing costs. Also, First Union will offer these loans at lower interest rates than affected homeowners agreed to pay under their original First Union loan. If affected homeowners apply and qualify for a new loan, their interest rates will be reduced by at least 2%. Applicants must meet First Union's underwriting standards in order to qualify. The term of these new loans will be equal to the number of months remaining on your First Union loan or, at your choice, another period provided that it does not exceed 20 years. The settlement further provides for a lesser guaranteed reduction in interest rate on loans refinanced under this settlement after September 8, 2003, if the prime rate of Wachovia increases in the interim. It is estimated that taking advantage of this settlement may reduce mortgage payments of affected homeowners by as much as $100 per month.

If affected homeowners file a timely claim and application for re-financing but fail to meet First Union's underwriting criteria, they will receive $200 or an equivalent credit to their loan. Similarly, if they refinanced their loan during 2003, or they already have refinanced and reduced the interest on their First Union loan by at least 1.5%, they will be entitled to $200.

While this partial settlement covers claims against First Union, the action against Pennsylvania Resource Corporation and First Liberty will proceed. In an earlier court decision in the matter, the court ruled that Pennsylvania Resource Corporation and First Liberty may owe fiduciary duties to homeowners because they go into homes armed with superior information about home equity financing and obtain personal information from homeowners regarding their debts, assets and incomes.

This proposed partial settlement will not be effective until the court grants it final approval. The court has scheduled a hearing on the matter for July 18, 2003.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of uninsured patients who received and were billed for medical care by any hospital within the Seattle based Providence Health Systems network of hospitals. The suit contends that Providence billed its uninsured patients at rates far in excess of the rates employed for insured patients and that this practice was and is both discriminatory and illegal.
 
A statewide class action has been filed in Indiana against Capital Recovery Associates, Inc. who operate under the name CRA Security Systems. The action is brought on behalf of all Indiana residents who received a form type collection letter demanding immediate payment of the consumers’ alleged debt. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
The class has been certified in an action filed against debt collector Corporate Receivables, Inc. on behalf of all persons with Illinois addresses who, on or after September 17, 2001, were sent a letter seeking to collect an amount allegedly owed to Household. The action alleges that Corporate Receivables failed to state clearly the amount of the debt it was seeking to collect in violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
 
Under federal law, a consumer who receives unsolicited merchandise is entitled to keep it without paying for it. The parties have reached a tentative settlement in a class action against book publisher and marketer Oxmoor House, Inc. on behalf of all persons who allege that they were sent unsolicited books and charged for them, or charged for books that they did not receive, in violation of the federal Unordered Merchandise stature, and Florida's deceptive trade practices and unfair collections laws. The legal notice describing the class action does not state the deadline for filing claims under the settlement.
 
A class action has been filed against debt collection agency Amsterdam & Lewinter, LLP, on behalf of all persons with New York state addresses, to whom a collection letter was sent between July 15, 2003, and July 15, 2004. The action alleges that the defendants violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by using deceptive trade practices in its attempts to collect an alleged debt.
 
A class action has been filed against Sterling National Bank, a New York City based bank that leases and finances telecommunications equipment, for violations of New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. Class members seek declaratory and injunctive relief terminating their obligations to make lease payments on telecommunications equipment to the Bank.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.