Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Georgians Haul USA Payday Cash Advance Centers into Court Alleging Excessive Interest on Short Term Loans

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2509 | Credit / Debt | 07/19/2004

A class action has been filed against numerous payday loan businesses, all of which are owned by Richard D. Clay, II, on behalf of all persons who entered into short-term loan transactions with the companies, alleging that the businesses violated the federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) and Truth in Lending Acts, and Georgia's civil and criminal usury statutes, when they charged the consumers excessive interest rates on the loans. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and treble punitive damages.

The action alleges that the companies charge customers 500% to 650% interest on short-term loans. The action further alleges that this business activity amounts to a conspiracy to unlawfully deprive consumers of money by charging these excessive amounts, and as such, implicates the RICO statute which authorizes triple punitive damages.

Payday loans are short-term, very high interest rate loans. The loans are typically two weeks in duration and carry annual percentage rates of 100% to over 1800%. The lender generally obtains a post-dated check as a means of repayment. At the end of the two week term, the customer has the option of continuing the loan for an additional period by paying the interest. The loans are typically rolled over on multiple occasions.

Generally, companies which make payday loans do not advertise the annual percentage rates. Instead, they advertise that the loans cost, e.g., $15 per $100. The consumer does not see the annual percentage rate until he or she is presented with the money. These loans are generally made to consumers facing financial emergencies. Once a consumer obtains such a loan, they will often be unable to pay it off except from the proceeds of additional loans. Often, the loans force the borrowers into unnecessary bankruptcies.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest

A national class action has been filed in New York against Rickenbacker Collections on behalf of all U.S. residents who have, since November 5, 2002, received a collection letter marked "Urgent Notice" and carrying Rickenbacker's letterhead that threatens litigation if the debt is not paid immediately. Debtors claim that these letters violate the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and are seeking declaratory relief and statutory damages.
 
If you fall behind on your car payments, California law allows the lender to repossess your car without any notice. A class action has been filed against Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation on behalf of Californians who had auto loans with the company and had their autos repossessed and sold at auction, leaving them with deficiency judgments to pay even though they lost the auto.
 
Federal credit and banking laws prohibit credit providers from discriminating based on ethnicity, national origin, or race. A class action has been filed against AmSouth Bank on behalf of African Americans who alleges that its car lending unit unfairly makes more expensive loans to blacks than whites in violation of the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
 
Two California consumers, Shane Satey and Kenneth Holtzclaw, brought a class action against Great Seneca Financial Corp. and the debt collection law firm of Wolpoff & Abramson, alleging unfair and fraudulent debt collection and credit reporting practices and also that Great Seneca was collecting debts in California for months without being properly registered as a California corporation.
 
A class action has been filed against the Ford Motor Credit Company on behalf of all Florida residents who leased cars from Ford between October 16, 1998, and October 16, 2003, and who paid "taxes" on itemized fees for wear and tear, excessive mileage and disposition of the vehicles at the end of their lease. The lessees claim that these "taxes" were merely hidden fees and that Ford either pocketed the "tax" money, or benefited from it prior to forwarding it to the Department of Revenue.
 
A class action lawsuit was filed against the nation’s largest tax resolution company, JK Harris & Company LLC, for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract including the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The lawsuit seeks to stop JK Harris & Company from continuing unacceptable business practices.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.