Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Oxmoor House Settles with Book Recipients who Received Unsolicited Merchandise

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2508 | Consumer Products | 10/16/2003

The parties have reached a tentative settlement in a class action against book publisher and marketer Oxmoor House, Inc. on behalf of all persons who allege that they were sent unsolicited books and charged for them, or charged for books that they did not receive, in violation of state and federal laws. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages.

In May 2002 Oxmoor House allegedly sent Gordon Sanderson a $29.71 bill for a gardening book similar to one that he had ordered and paid for three years earlier. In the interim, he had suffered a stroke that left him unable to garden anymore.

The action alleges that Oxmoor enrolls people like Mr. Sanderson, who legitimately order a book, in an "automatic delivery plan," sending more books that they didn't order or billing them for books that never arrive. The company allegedly sends out a mail solicitation that tells customers about the automatic delivery plan--but the solicitation allegedly looks like junk mail and many customers simply throw it away. If the customer doesn't send back the refusal form, the books and bills start arriving.

Customers who don't pay the bills are allegedly sent letters demanding payment. The action alleges that the letters say the customer can be put into a "bad debt" file if they do not pay.

Last year, Oxmoor House, which has its order fulfillment center in Tampa, entered into a plea agreement with the Florida Attorney General's Office to refund money to Floridians who paid at least $50 for any automatically shipped books. The Attorney General's Office alleged that the company had not adequately advised customers that buying a book would obligate them to receive future books in the series.

The settlement defines five separate classes of people that may be eligible for recovery:

1. Those who received and paid for no more than one or two subsequent books from June 15, 1997, through October 5, 2001. These people will be eligible to make a claim for an $8.00 refund for each subsequent book in all series in which the class member was enrolled and which they received and paid for but did not intend to receive or order.

2. Those who received and paid for no more than one or two subsequent books between October 6, 2001, and December 31, 2002, and who ordered their first enrollment book in a series on or before April 30, 2002. They are entitled to purchase a current book with a retail price of not less than $29.95 for the discounted price of $12.00, including shipping and handling.

3. Those who received at most one or two subsequent books from June 15, 1997, through December 31, 2002, returned one or more of these books, and paid the return postage. This group will be entitled to make a claim for a $3.95 refund for each subsequent book returned to Oxmoor House at the class member's own expense.

4. Those who received and paid for three or more subsequent books from June 15, 1997, through December 31, 2002. These class members are entitled to purchase a current book with a retail price of not less than $29.95 for the discounted price of $12.00, including shipping and handling.

5. Those who received at most one or two subsequent books between June 15, 1997, and October 5, 2001, and whose accounts have been classified by Oxmoor House as "pending" or "bad debt" or referred by Oxmoor House to a collection agency. For this group, Oxmoor House will cease efforts to collect amounts that may be owed for subsequent books covered by the settlement. These class members may keep the books sent to them with no adverse consequences to their credit.

The settlement will not be effective until the court grants it final approval. The court has scheduled a hearing on the matter for September 19, 2003.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest

A physician education company filed a lawsuit against the second-largest commercial property owner in Dallas. The lawsuit alleges negligence in handling confidential private information and breach of contract.
 
The Illinois Supreme Court recently ruled that a lawsuit filed against Cingular Wireless can proceed as a class action.
 
Exterior sealants are formulated to prevent mildew and make surfaces waterproof. The court has granted final approval to the parties' $55 million settlement in a class action against sealant manufacturer Behr Process Corporation on behalf of all residents of 19 western Washington counties who purchased and applied any of four exterior wood sealants to their property there, at any time between May 28, 1992, and March 17, 2003, and who experienced mildew growth upon those surfaces after May 28, 1994.
 
Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS") announces that shareholders of Shuffle Master, Inc. ("Shuffle Master" or the "Company") (Nasdaq:SHFL) who purchased shares of the Company between December 22, 2006 and March 12, 2007 (the "Class Period"), have 59 days, or until August 3, 2007, to move for appointment as Lead Plaintiff in a securities fraud class action lawsuit currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. No class has yet been certified in this action.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Middle District Court of Florida against Sonic Automotive, Inc. for unlawful, deceptive, and misleading business practices and tortuous acts in the State of Florida. Class members seek compensatory and statutory damages as well as attorney's fees and costs of the litigation.
 
A class action has been filed against Thermal Ease Hydronic Systems, Inc., its parent company Plasco Manufacturing Ltd. (now known as Uponor Canada, Inc.), and other firms on behalf of all people in the United States who now own, or owned in the past, buildings in which a hydronic heating system using cross-linked non-barrier polyethylene pipe manufactured by Thermal Ease was installed on or after January 1, 1995. This pipe, known as UltraPEX, allegedly deteriorates over time as a result of being exposed to regular tap water, which contains chemicals such as chlorine.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.